Israeli Support for Argentine Sovereignty over Malvinas and Protest over HMS Medway

Israel’s National Security Minister, Itamar Ben-Gvir, expressed on his X account his support for Argentina’s claim over the Falkland Islands. In his message, he asked Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu to recognize Argentine sovereignty and to impose sanctions on Britain as long as the occupation continues. Ben-Gvir stated that the British “violently rob the Argentine people” and are carrying out oil drilling in the territory.

The message was disseminated in a context of renewed debate over the islands, following statements by United States President Donald Trump, who suggested reviewing support for Britain due to its lack of backing during the war against Iran. Additionally, Argentine President Javier Milei announced last week measures related to the Malvinas, such as tightening sanctions on foreign companies operating in the area and creating a naval base in Tierra del Fuego.

Formal protest by Argentina over HMS Medway

The Argentine Foreign Ministry reported that on July 13, a protest note was presented to the United Kingdom Embassy in Buenos Aires over the movements of the HMS Medway vessel, illegally stationed in the Falkland Islands. According to the official statement, the transit was not notified in accordance with existing bilateral agreements, constituting a violation of the Joint Declaration of September 25, 1991, and its annexes.

The Argentine government rejected the “British military incursion into spaces under Argentine jurisdiction” and described it as part of a “sustained policy of unilateral acts” incompatible with United Nations resolutions. The protest is framed within General Assembly Resolution 31/49, which urges both parties to refrain from modifying the situation while the sovereignty dispute is pending.

Context of statements and measures

The sequence of recent events includes the Argentine diplomatic protest and Ben-Gvir’s statements. According to Crónica, the Israeli minister’s message came amid the debate promoted by Trump. Meanwhile, Milei announced measures such as sanctions on foreign companies and the creation of a naval base, although no timelines or implementation mechanisms were specified.

It is important to note that Ben-Gvir’s statement does not represent an official position of the Israeli government, but rather an individual opinion of a minister. In contrast, the Argentine protest is based on bilateral agreements and UN resolutions, giving it a more solid legal framework.

Coincidences and differences between sources

The primary source is the Argentine Foreign Ministry’s statement, which documents the formal protest and details the bilateral agreements. The secondary source, the Crónica article, reports on Ben-Gvir’s statement and the measures announced by Milei. Both sources coincide in the context of diplomatic tension, but differ in focus: the Foreign Ministry focuses on the violation of agreements by the United Kingdom, while Crónica highlights Israel’s international support.

No information is available on the United Kingdom’s response to the protest or on Israel’s official reaction to Ben-Gvir’s statements. Nor are data provided on the economic impact of oil drilling or the costs of the naval base.

Value module: comparison of dates and agreements

The table shows that the Argentine protest is supported by bilateral agreements and international resolutions, while Ben-Gvir’s statement lacks similar legal backing. No currency or unit conversions are made because no economic data are provided.

What to follow

The most relevant data to follow is the United Kingdom’s response to the Argentine protest note and whether the Israeli government officially pronounces on Ben-Gvir’s statement. It is also important to monitor the implementation of the measures announced by Milei, especially the creation of the naval base and sanctions on foreign companies, as they could generate new tensions with the United Kingdom.